Auto navigation systems have improved a great deal since they were developed by the US armed forces in the Sixties and Seventies. In fact, their development is a continuous process, as you can well imagine. I remember in the Eighties when you received a fix on your location every twelve minutes or so.
This meant that 'sat nav' was great for shipping and yachts, but not much good for cars or other fast-moving vehicles. They were also rather expensive and quite large, not like the devices that cyclists can get in a wrist watch these days.
In spite of the fact that sat nav has advanced far enough for companies to be able to produce affordable auto navigation systems, there are still glitches with them. But there is nothing new about that, it has become normal to start selling a product while it is still at some phase of improvement.
Look at MS Widows for an example; it is nearly thirty years old and still does not work seamlessly - it is still 'under improvement'. The same is true of auto navigation systems.
And part of the problem is with the software running the device. Software is a very tricky thing, as Windows proves to its users every day. I am not of necessity criticizing Windows software, it is probably the best of its class, but then there is no real competition for it and that is a shame for all the usual reasons such as apathy, high-handedness and over-pricing, just look at Windows 'Vista'. What an expensive pile of junk that was.
Needless to say, if Microsoft cannot get their software right, then auto navigation systems cannot either. Therefore, it is important to use an auto navigation device that either frequently updates itself automatically or allows the user to do it manually.
You have to have the latest bug-fixes to the software and the latest updates to the maps. Ideally, the unit should update itself every day automatically, but you should do it manually at least before each long journey.
The signal is obviously very important as well. In order to get a fix on your location at least three satellites must be able to 'see' your auto navigation apparatus. If a fourth can verify the data, then so much the better.
This means that you may vanish 'off the radar', so to speak, if you are travelling under ground or in mostly built-up locations. Being tracked by one or two satellites is not good enough, there is no triangulation.
It is rational to assume that if you have a clear view of the sky, then the three or four satellites should have a clear view of you, but it is not an infallible test. The best thing to have with you is still common sense. Do not just depend on your auto navigation system blindly. If you think it is giving you a false reading, perhaps it is.
In this situation, the best thing to do is think about whether you or it is right and check it with a map if you have one. If all else fails, take a bit of advice often made by Windows support, turn the device off, count to ten and turn it back on again - in other words, reboot it.
This meant that 'sat nav' was great for shipping and yachts, but not much good for cars or other fast-moving vehicles. They were also rather expensive and quite large, not like the devices that cyclists can get in a wrist watch these days.
In spite of the fact that sat nav has advanced far enough for companies to be able to produce affordable auto navigation systems, there are still glitches with them. But there is nothing new about that, it has become normal to start selling a product while it is still at some phase of improvement.
Look at MS Widows for an example; it is nearly thirty years old and still does not work seamlessly - it is still 'under improvement'. The same is true of auto navigation systems.
And part of the problem is with the software running the device. Software is a very tricky thing, as Windows proves to its users every day. I am not of necessity criticizing Windows software, it is probably the best of its class, but then there is no real competition for it and that is a shame for all the usual reasons such as apathy, high-handedness and over-pricing, just look at Windows 'Vista'. What an expensive pile of junk that was.
Needless to say, if Microsoft cannot get their software right, then auto navigation systems cannot either. Therefore, it is important to use an auto navigation device that either frequently updates itself automatically or allows the user to do it manually.
You have to have the latest bug-fixes to the software and the latest updates to the maps. Ideally, the unit should update itself every day automatically, but you should do it manually at least before each long journey.
The signal is obviously very important as well. In order to get a fix on your location at least three satellites must be able to 'see' your auto navigation apparatus. If a fourth can verify the data, then so much the better.
This means that you may vanish 'off the radar', so to speak, if you are travelling under ground or in mostly built-up locations. Being tracked by one or two satellites is not good enough, there is no triangulation.
It is rational to assume that if you have a clear view of the sky, then the three or four satellites should have a clear view of you, but it is not an infallible test. The best thing to have with you is still common sense. Do not just depend on your auto navigation system blindly. If you think it is giving you a false reading, perhaps it is.
In this situation, the best thing to do is think about whether you or it is right and check it with a map if you have one. If all else fails, take a bit of advice often made by Windows support, turn the device off, count to ten and turn it back on again - in other words, reboot it.
About the Author:
Owen Jones, the author of this piece writes on various topics, but is currently involved with the Snooper sat nav system. If you would like to know more, please go to our website at Escort 8500.
0 comments:
Post a Comment